Lurk

Price Rationale

Final value blends the four appraiser views around the lower-to-mid non-grail early-XCOPY band, with extra weight on the comparable and cultural appraisals because Lurk has no live bid/ask, no OTC sale, no grail flag, and no supplied candidate benchmarks. The exact-token history is one clean SuperRare onchain sale from xcopy.eth on 2019-01-03 for 1.25 ETH / $187.38, also the last and highest exact sale, but that print is origin-era provenance rather than a current cap. The 2026-04-23 packet has a null ETH/USD snapshot, so no current USD conversion is inferred. A 55 ETH fair value sits above stale 2019 pricing and nearby lower anchors such as Born to Buy at 1.25 ETH, The Jungle at 12 ETH, Remnant at 29 ETH, and Generation Null at 25 ETH, while staying below stronger or better-evidenced early works with later 100+ ETH clears.

What Caps The Price

A higher valuation would require relying too much on broader XCOPY strength rather than Lurk-specific proof. The supplied evidence has no post-2019 exact-token sale, no current ask, no current best bid, no OTC history, no grail/public-standing flag, and zero candidate benchmarks. Later high marks such as Crunch at 115 ETH, LIES at 207 ETH, Breaker at 100 ETH, Afterglow at 128 ETH, When Airdrop? at 151.2 ETH, $LAVE at 315 ETH, and Chatbot and Chill? at 800 ETH show the cohort's upside, but they are stronger, more recent, or more evidenced works rather than direct proof for Lurk.

What Supports The Price

A lower mark would over-anchor to the 1.25 ETH / $187.38 sale from 2019-01-03 and understate the scarcity of a 2018-12-30 SuperRare XCOPY OneOfOne. The supplied universe shows nearby non-grail late-2018 works later clearing materially above primary-era prices, including The Jungle at 12 ETH, Remnant at 29 ETH, Generation Null at 25 ETH, Crunch at 115 ETH, and LIES at 207 ETH. Lurk's lack of recent liquidity warrants a discount and wider bid/ask spread, but not a collapse toward the stale original sale.