Influencer

Price Rationale

Final value balances the clean but stale exact-token history with the broader early-XCOPY re-rating reflected by three of the four appraisers. Influencer is a February 2019 SuperRare XCOPY 1/1 with two exact onchain sales: 1.1 ETH on 2019-02-09 and 12.0 ETH on 2020-09-21, the latter remaining the last and highest sale. The sole supplied formal peer, Man with new iPhone on the Hammersmith & City line, is described as nearest peer below and shares the same 12 ETH 2020 sale anchor, no OTC record, and non-grail status. I mark above the 12 ETH stale-sale/peer floor because early SuperRare XCOPY 1/1s were substantially re-rated after 2020, but below the cultural and cycle appraisers high-end marks because the packet has no live ask, no best bid, no OTC sale, no recent exact-token sale, and no grail flag.

What Caps The Price

A higher valuation would need stronger present-tense execution evidence: a current bid or ask, recent exact-token sale, OTC demand, multiple higher same-tier peers, or a grail/core-canon signal. The only formal benchmark is a non-grail nearest peer with the same stale 12 ETH 2020 sale, and importing stronger 100+ ETH adjacent-era results would overstate the allowed evidence for this specific token.

What Supports The Price

A lower valuation would lean too heavily on the 2020 12 ETH sale as if no later XCOPY 1/1 repricing occurred. The work is a scarce 2019 SuperRare XCOPY 1/1 with clean provenance, a culturally legible social-media title/theme, and a same-tier peer confirming the 12 ETH anchor rather than contradicting it. Non-grail and thin liquidity justify a discount, not a return to the old sale level.