Loading New Conflict... Redux 1

Price Rationale

Final value weights the direct same-series evidence heavily while applying a meaningful liquidity discount. The strongest anchor is the supplied Loading New Conflict Redux 2 sale at 300 ETH in 2024, supported by Redux 5 at 74 ETH in 2021 and broader early XCOPY SuperRare 1/1 scarcity. Redux 1's exact-token 0.2 ETH sale from 2018 is provenance rather than current market evidence. Because the packet shows no current ask, no current best bid, no OTC sale history, no recent exact-token sale, and no grail flag, the fair value is set below the 300 ETH sibling mark rather than matching it. The final 210 ETH value aligns with the comparable and cultural appraisals, acknowledges the USD-cycle argument for a strong post-peak sibling anchor, and incorporates the liquidity appraiser's warning mainly through a wider and lower bid side.

What Caps The Price

Not higher because the 300 ETH Redux 2 sale is a single sibling transaction rather than a direct Redux 1 clearing price. Redux 1 has no current bid or ask, no sale since 2018, no OTC history, and is not flagged as a grail. Exceeding or matching the 300 ETH sibling mark would overstate certainty given sparse token-specific demand evidence.

What Supports The Price

Not lower because the stale 0.2 ETH 2018 exact-token sale is not a useful current anchor for an early SuperRare XCOPY 1/1. The work has explicit Loading New Conflict Redux lineage, Redux 1 of 6 positioning, and same-family sales at 74 ETH and 300 ETH. A valuation near the liquidity-only low case would underweight the best supplied same-series market evidence.